The browser you are using is not supported by this website. All versions of Internet Explorer are no longer supported, either by us or Microsoft (read more here: https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/microsoft-365/windows/end-of-ie-support).

Please use a modern browser to fully experience our website, such as the newest versions of Edge, Chrome, Firefox or Safari etc.

Greenhouse gas emissions from our business travel have decreased

Train in tha Alp landscape.

Emissions from our air travel decreased in 2024, compared with the previous year. Air travel accounts for the main part of our emissions from business travel and therefore the total climate impact of our business travel has decreased, even though emissions from car travel have increased.

Every year, in connection with its annual report, the University submits a report on our environmental management work to the Swedish Environmental Protection Agency, which coordinates the state’s environmental management work. The report, which has now been approved and published includes, among other things, statistics for our business travel from our procured travel agency. 

Emissions from business travel in CO2e

The report states that emissions from air travel in 2024 declined by 6% on the previous year. The total distance travelled and costs have also decreased. In a comparison with air travel before the pandemic, the reduction is even larger. During the same period, the number of staff, measured as full-time equivalents, has increased by 5.5% from 7,055 in 2019 to 7,445 in 2024. Thus, even though there are more employees, travel has been reduced overall.  

“It is pleasing that emissions from the University’s business travel via air have decreased. Most business trips can be done by train, for example rail travel is now used for trips to Stockholm. There are also quite a few meetings and conferences for which online participation is now the only option. As an international university, we will also continue to fly, but we can still reduce the emissions from our flights without it affecting our operations negatively,” says Per Mickwitz pro vice-chancellor for sustainability.

Diagram with three staples.
Figure 1: The bars show the CO2 emissions for business travel for the years 2019, 2023 and 2024, broken down by car/bus/train and by air respectively. The figures for aviation emissions include the high-altitude effect. From 2024 onwards, the statistics in the Report on Lund University's environmental management work are reported without the high-altitude effect. The high-altitude effect is about the climate impact of aviation being almost twice as large when emissions of nitrogen oxides, water vapour, etc. occur high up in the atmosphere. In 2020, the calculation method for emissions from air travel was changed. The figures for 2019 are recalculated using the current method for comparison. The graph shows ‘CO2e’, which is correct for flights and trains. Otherwise, CO2 is calculated.

Emissions from travel, accommodation and conferences account for about 6% of the University’s total climate impact, according to our latest climate spend analysis. It provides a rough estimate of the carbon footprint, and is mainly used to see which purchasing categories have the largest footprint. A climate spend analysis is a calculation of climate impact, based on all our purchases.

Diagram showing business travle in kilometres.
Figure 2. The graph shows business travel by air measured in kilometres for the years 2019 - 2024.

Emissions per SEK are based on the indicators from the National Agency for Public Procurement for each purchasing category.

Travel habits survey generated improvement suggestions

The responses to the travel habits survey conducted in autumn 2024 contained suggestions to further reduce emissions from travel. The initiatives most staff members suggested to enable them to travel less often or more sustainability on business are: 

  • Easier booking and payment of bus and rail travel (33% of those who answered the question)
  • Better information on expectations regarding business travel (12%)
  • Better options for online meetings (11%)

Interest in Sustainable alternatives

Table with a lot of alternatives.
Figure 3. The percentage shows the proportion of employees who indicated each action. Up to five answers could be given, so the total sum is more than 100%.

The comments section also contained many requests for an updated travel policy that clarifies the rules for business travel. About twenty per cent of the travel habits survey respondents were not aware of the University’s travel guidelines for business trips and a further thirty per cent answered that they did not get sufficiently good support from the guidelines to be able to choose sustainable travel.